Protopresbyter Theodoros Zisis
Saint Nektarios as seen through his Letters
A Myrrh-streamer and a Wonderworker, but also a great theologian and writer.
Saint Nektarios, the boast of the Orthodox faithful of our age, was honoured by God in the most telling of manners; his holy relics stream myrrh and he miraculously heals many suffering from illness. He is, then, both a Myrrh-streamer and a Wonderworker. Greece in particular is full of churches dedicated to his memory, of his icons, which hang in almost every church and in the homes of devout Orthodox Christians, of books recounting his life and works, of editions of his own writings which are continually reprinted, and above all, of countless narrations of his innumerable miracles. His fame and veneration have already taken on a pan-Orthodox character with the many faithful from countries other than Greek seeking his aid and protection. In addition, the Holy Trinity Monastery in Aegina has become a site of pan-Orthodox pilgrimage having been established by the Saint himself, having been sanctified both through the work of his hands and, indeed, by his very presence, for he passed the final years of his life there in humility and ascetical struggle.
Recently, next to the monastery’s humble cells, built not only under Saint Nektarios’ supervision, but through the labour of his own hands, a great and beautiful church was erected in his memory that God’s name might be magnified through the honour bestowed on his Saint: “God is wonderful in his saints!” At the same time, all this serves as a proclamation that, even in our difficult times, God honours and glorifies the humble, the persecuted, and the despised, rather than the proud and the powerful who, through their worldly, arrogant and malicious conduct, cause God’s name to be blasphemed, his holy Church to be attacked and many Christians to be scandalized. God, the only just judge exalted the humble and obedient Metropolitan of Pentapolis, exiled from Alexandria and despised, above those who had judged him, raising him to the place of eternal joy, where his memory will be eternal.
According to God’s plan and in his providence, persecutions and sorrows are beneficial to those individuals who accept such divine lessons without complaint. Simultaneously, however, by means of such circumstances, the all-wise God is also provides for other of the Church’s needs – needs often indiscernible to the clouded minds of men. The presence of the exiled Metropolitan of Pentapolis’ in Greece was certainly something greatly needed. First, through a plethora of illumined writings, Saint Nektarios presented the Orthodox tradition, projecting the theology of the Holy Fathers and the Ecumenical Councils against the rationalistic academic theology brought to Greece through foreign textbooks. Second, as principal of the Rizareio Ecclesiastical School for fourteen years (1894-1908) he laid the foundation for sound theological education, the fruit of which can still be seen today. Finally, his establishing the Monastery of the Holy Trinity in Aegina, to whose stillness and isolation the Saint retired after his resignation as principal of the Rizareio School, was an important, God-inspired action which served to promote and encourage Orthodox monasticism which, from the time of the Baron of Othonos, had been unjustly persecuted and slandered.
Saint Nektarios’ multi-volume written production is also invaluable. He authored roughly fifty studies which cover not only volumes and volumes of materials, but also a wide variety of themes including history, hermeneutics, dogmatics, ethics, pastoral theology, philosophy, apologetics, poetics, hymnology, liturgics and homiletics. A number of them are also expositions of Patristic texts. As Archimandrite Epiphanios Delidemos, a well-read student of Saint Nektarios’ works, has rightly observed, “We find ourselves before a complex intellect, dedicated to the service of the Church, who was concerned to share with the faithful in writing whatever he possessed that was good and beneficial.” This is in full agreement with the opinion of A. Alivizatos who writes that, “…his books and writings are worthy of much praise. A number of these filled what at that time were obvious and well-noted voids in our theological literature, such as his harmony of the Gospels, his work on pastoral theology, his Psalter, his collection of maxims and sayings from the Holy Scriptures and many others. These works held an eminent place amongst the few theological books published at that time.”
The letters of Saint Nektarios.
Within the context of his other writings, the Saint’s epistles occupy a special place: in this regard this new Father of the Church takes after the Holy Fathers of antiquity. He did not write theological works alone but also letters of varied content, letters of living, personal content, by means of which we might trace the path of his holy life, witnessing first-hand the various troubles he encountered, the bitter disappointments he tasted, but also the joy he experienced when he saw the work he had undertaken for the salvation of souls beat fruit. These also record his aims and hopes for the future. Most of these letters have already been published in large part thanks to the ever-memorable Metropolitan of Paramythia, who has also made significant contribution to the more general presentation of his character and works. Beyond the letters he has published in his lengthy biography of the Saint, His Eminence also published a volume containing 136 of the Saint’s letters written to the nuns of the Holy Trinity Monastery in Aegina between 1904 and 1908. During this period he was still the principal of the Rizareio School and was therefore obliged to direct the nuns (all of whom were new to the monastic life) by means of letters. This is the most significant – both in terms of length and content – section of the Saint’s correspondence. From out of this body of 130 catechetical letters, Fr Theokletos Dionysiates selected thrity-five, publishing them together with some interesting introductory comments. Also, an Athonite monastic brotherhood, the Danielites, who have in their possession letters between Saint Nektarios and the brotherhood’s founder, Elder Daniel of Katounakia, published this correspondence along with an extended introduction which I myself have penned. Several individual letters have also been published by other students of his life and work. With the blessing of the former Metropolitan of Aegina, Hierotheos, as well as the current Metropolitan, Ephraim, and under the supervision of an editorial committee (of which I am a member, specifically charged with the duty of overseeing the publication of the letters), however, the entire body of Saint Nektarios letters will be published by the Monastery of the Holy Trinity in a forthcoming volume of the Saint’s Collected Works. From an academic/research perspective, the two academic conferences in Aegina have already paved the way for the publication of the Collected Works.
A brief presentation of his letters’ contents.
In what follows we will undertake a chronological survey of the letters authored by the Saint, pausing to make a few references to their contents which depict, albeit faintly, the wealth of the Saint’s virtues. An adequate presentation of these virtues would require much time and space, since this humble, poor, and ascetical Saint was in this lone sense covetous; he coveted virtue and holiness. This treasure which he amassed, then, which finds particular expression within his letters, will be presented here only superficially.
Chronologically, we might divide the Saint’s letters into three periods; first, those written prior to his becoming principal of the Rizareio Ecclesiastical School, that is to say prior to 1894; second, those written during his fourteen years as principal at the Rizareio School, from 1894-1908; and third, those written during the final twelve years of his life when he lived at the Monastery of the Holy Trinity in Aegina (1908-1920).
A) Letters dating prior to his assuming the position of principal at the Rizareio School.
The letters belonging to this period mostly relate to the Saint’s unjust exile from Alexandria, the result of the envy which both his holy life and the love which the faithful bore for him provoked in unworthy clergymen. Relating to his pastoral activities in Egypt, one of the Saint’s letters, written while he was still an Archimandrite and the Patriarchate’s representative to Cairo, has been preserved. In this letter addressed to the Archbishop of Sinai, the Saint intervenes to settle a debt with a Muslim coachman who had not been paid in two years, despite the fact he had provided his coaches to be used in the funeral service of an Orthodox Christian of Italian descent. As the editor of this letter observes, “The sensitive soul of the then forty-year old Archimandrite Nektarios Kephalas could not abide such an injustice, especially, as he writes, when someone of another race or religion was the target. This minor event in 1884 is an indication of the great heart, of the holy life of this persecuted saint.”
All of the remaining letters belonging to this period relate to his expulsion from the Patriarchate of Alexandria, his suspension from his ecclesiastical positions, and the general uncertainly of his status. On 15 January 1889, Patriarch Sophronios of Alexandria consecrated him Metropolitan of Pentapolis in Saint Nicholas Church in Cairo, having ordained him a priest and made him an Archimandrite, entrusting him to be the Patriarchate’s representative in Cairo three years previous (1886). One other letter from his time as an Archimandrite serving in Cairo dating to 1887 has been preserved. Addressing Matthew of Thebes, Saint Nektarios refers to some epidemic illness from which he himself had suffered. Not even a year passed from the date of his consecration to the episcopate before the persecution against him began, persecutions in which even Patriarch Sophronios himself took part, having been lured into participation by “…a few self-serving, devious, scheming, and ambitious clergymen, who, as their letters reveal, had no moral compass.” On 3 May 1890, by decision of the Patriarchate, Saint Nektarios was rereleased from his position as director of the Patriarchate’s offices in Cairo, as well as from his duties as representative of the Patriarchate, and as the area’s Ecclesiastical administrator. He was permitted, however, to keep his room, if he so desired, “…studying, writing, and partaking of the food of the common table with the other priests.” A month and a half later, on 11 July 1890, “…His Holiness [Saint Nektarios] is requested to leave our Patriarchal See, and if he has not yet done so, to do so when he wishes,” since, “…His Holiness’ further presence in Egypt has been deemed unnecessary.” Also, he was not given, without first asking for it, “…a letter of discharge from the Patriarchate, as might be used according to necessity.”
The meek and forbearing hierarch, “deaf and dumb”, accepted this unexpected development without complaint, not exploiting the protests of the faithful in an attempt to challenge this decision, but rather bearing this cross of sorrow and injustice with patience and resignation. In accordance with the Patriarchate’s command, then, he left Egypt, homeless and left hanging in mid-air ecclesiastically, to search for some position in Athens. There he did not attempt to find for himself some enviable ecclesiastical position: though a Metropolitan, he applied to become a simple ierokyrakas in an attempt to secure his daily bread. Concerning ecclesiastical offices the Saint would later write succinctly to the Monk Ioasaf that, “…offices do not raise on high the one who possesses them. Virtue alone has the power to lift a man up and betroths one to prefect glory.” He then sealed these words with his own example. Much the same can be said for that which he writes to Elder Daniel of Katounakia concerning sorrows and their pedagogical importance.
The unresentful Nektarios did not even cease from communication with his persecutor, Patriarch Sophronios, sending him the books which he published. Five of the Saint’s letters to the Patriarch have dating between August 1893 and April 1894, opening this period of his life to us. In the first of these, he asks the Patriarch to be accepting of his good disposition, and to forgive him his many sins, and whatever in particular he did to embitter him, while at the same he extends his forgiveness to those who had embittered him. “Since it is required that we first forgive the sins of others, I have already forgiven all, and pray for those who sinned against me.” In the third letter, dated 11 November 1893, he asks the Patriarch if he might be allowed if he might permit him, “an extended stay in the Patriarchal See near the library, or at the Patriarchate, or even at Saint George’s” since his work as a preacher in Fthiotida left him no time to for study and writing. Though he received no response to this request, in March of 1894 he sent a letter to the Patriarch, greeting him on account of his Name’s day. In this same letter he also informed the Patriarch of the happy news concerning his appointment as principal of the Rizareio School, asking him to pray for the school’s success and that he might be able to fulfill his new, lofty duties. It would seem that Patriarch Sophronios responded warmly to this letter since Saint Nektarios sent another, ever warmer letter back to the Patriarch in April of 1894.
Sadly, this attempt at reconciliation was completely overturned. Events turned suddenly, and without cause, as well as in a matter which hurt the Saint deeply. His enemies in the Patriarchal court were in no mood to forgive. When the government had sought information from Greece’s diplomatic representative in Egypt, a Mr. Gryparis, in January of 1894 concerning whether it should proceed to appoint Saint Nektarios as principal, this same civil servant, upon presenting the Saint’s career and his good relations with the Patriarch in his confidential letter to the Minister of Public Education, writes that, “…later, becoming displeasing [i.e., Saint Nektarios] to the Patriarch in as much as he exhibited a disposition towards acting without restraint and independently. The Patriarch considered this disposition insubordinate and sought to punish him and it was for this reason that His All-Holiness thought it best that he leave Egypt. According to Patriarchal sources it was on account of moral indiscretions that the Metropolitan of Pentapolis left Egypt, though according to other sources, equally trustworthy, the Metropolitan was a victim of intrigue and slander.” Wanting to be as objective as possible, Gryparis concludes: “In conclusion, I have the honour to report to you that I know from His Eminence that beyond all this, the Metropolitan of Pentapolis is considered an excellent cleric, both energetic and effective, even by those in the Patriarchate.”
The sixth and final letter which Saint Nektarios sends to Patriarch Sophronios upon being informed of the diplomat’s letter and consequently the renewal of false accusations against him is indeed moving. He neither protests the accusations, nor makes threats, nor even reviles. He does not even complain about the unfounded accusations which lead to his being exiled from Egypt for being some sort of immoral revolutionary. Instead, he asks: “What ecclesiastical court has tried and condemned me? Where are their records? Where are the witnesses? Where is corpus delicti? Upon what grounds are the accusations against me, on account of which I have already been sentenced to moral death, supported? What great evil have I done either to You, Your All-Holiness, or to those of the Patriarchal court, that warrant being put to death? Why are you so enraged with me that your wrath has followed me such a distance seeking my complete destruction?” Then, calling on God as his witness, he says that he never taken in mind to do anything evil to another human being, describing himself as a lover and worker of the good alone: “I have sought to do solely what is good all my life, and of this good I was both a lover and a worker.”
B) Letters dating to his time as principal of the Rizareio School (1894-1908)
The accusations levied by those in the Patriarchal court in Alexandria did not hinder the Saint’s appointment as director of the Rizareio Ecclesiastical School which became radiant as a result of his presence and holy life. During this relatively calm but arduous fourteen year period of his life, Saint Nektarios authored not only many great writings, but also many – in fact, most – of his letters. The first series of letters belonging to this period are related to Saint Nektarios’ efforts to rehabilitate his relationship with the Alexandrian Patriarchate following the death of Sophronios and the election of his successor in 1890. Writing to the new Patriarch, Photios, in October of 1902, he asks that justice be done and that his position as a Hierarch of the Church of Alexandria be affirmed. In September of 1903, however, having yet received no response, he wrote a letter to Joachim III, the Ecumenical Patriarchate, asking direction specific to his situation, but also to generally “…settle his position as a Hierarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church”. Joachim III immediately brought the issue before the Patriarchal Synod but, because the matter involved a clergyman belonging to another jurisdiction, the Synod simply addressed a letter to Photios of Alexandria, “…to whose sovereign judgement and evaluation the matter is referred.” At the same time the Synod informed the Metropolitan of Pentapolis by letter that the only thing that it could do was to forward his letter and the related documents to the Patriarch of Alexandria, since, “…as will be evident to His Eminence, beyond these actions, our Church can take no further action with regard to this issue.”
Other series of letters dating to this period are connected either with his sending copies of his books to the monasteries on the Holy Mountain or individual monks, or with his efforts to keep up correspondence with different persons, though particularly with the well-known elders and spiritual fathers of his era. Eleven of these letters which were addressed to Vatopedi Monastery between 1900 and 1906, have already been published, while one letter addressed to Hilandar Monastery (1903) and three addressed to the Simonas Petras Monastery (1902-1907) have also been preserved. One particularly impressive letter has been preserved from his correspondence with Elder Joasaph Agioannitis of the Saint John Chrysostom Skete in which he seeks to put ecclesiastical offices in perspective. Highlighting the significance of the monastic life, he writes: “Truly, what is more honorable, more radiant, than the monastic way of life? I must confess in all sincerity my conviction, according to which I consider the ascetic to be greater than the hierarch.” Referring to this letter, Fr Theoklitos Dionysiatis writes that it constitutes, “…a wonderful analytical comparison of the importance of the office of hierarch in relation to that of a virtuous monk.”
During this same period the Saint also wrote a series of letters to Elder Daniel of Katounakia, the founder of the Danielite brotherhood. These four letters, along with sections of a fifth which has been lost, reveal something of the period between 1903 and 1908. The first of these letters is of particular value since in it Saint Nektarios consoles the Elder, writing concerning the pedagogical and spiritual value of sorrows. We ourselves had the greet blessing of overseeing the Danielite brotherhood’s efforts to publish this correspondence between Saint Nektarios and Elder Daniel, and to survey its contests in our introduction to the subsequent edition.
In addition, there exist a series of letters which the Saint wrote to Elder Pachomios of Chios. Pachomios, a hesychast who initially took up the monastic life in the New Monastery of Chios but later withdrew to a hesychasterion on Mount Provateio near the monastery, established a coenobitic women’s monastery in Frankovouni which lived in desert-like austerity. It is to Elder Pachomios that the Saint owed his own initiation into the monastic life, and he refers to him frequently in his letters to the nuns at Holy Trinity Monastery in Ageina.
Also worthy of mention is Saint Nektarios’ letter to Metropolitan Spyridon of Kephalonia, in which he argues strongly that the risen Lord appeared first to the Most-Holy Theotokos, and not to Mary Magdalene who, he also notes, ought not to be numbered among the sinful women.
By far the largest division in the corpus of Saint Nektarios’ letters, however, are the 136 which are addressed to the nuns of Holy Trinity Monastery between 1904 and 1908 when he was yet principal of the Rizareio School, but had already established the monastery and had set the sisterhood up there. This separation indeed proved fortunate, for we would have been deprived of this great treasure if things had occurred any other way. From the Rizareio School the Saint took care of all the novice monastic’s necessities, both material and spiritual, demonstrating tireless concern for them. He guided the sisterhood towards spiritual perfection with humility and love, but above all with discretion, guarding it from ascetical extremes, but also confronting serious lapses with the utmost strictness. Nor did he neglect his responsibility to teach the sisters, presenting at length in his letter the homilies which he was preaching in the different churches of Athens, and sending them copies of the hymns to the Most-Holy Theotokos which he had composed. He also shows a touching concern for their health, sending them medicine, asking them if they are taking what has been prescribed, and scolding them when they neglected to do so; he even looked after their rassos and their shoes. This he did that their love might increase; not their love for him, but rather for Christ, the heavenly bridegroom. These letters constitute an excellent guide, an excellent outline, of the monastic life. Knowledge of them would undoubtedly serve as an aid to today’s abbots and abbesses in their own efforts to provide discerning, humble and loving spiritual direction to monastic communities. As we have already said, these letter were first published by Metropolitan Titus of Paramythia, though a selection has also been published by Fr Theoklitos Dionysiatis, who himself writes: “These letters are truly a treasure, not solely because they were written by the Saint at an age of spiritual maturity, when was brimming with spiritual experience and when was ready vessel of the Holy Spirit, but also because they are possessed of a certain urgency which his writings lack since these are addressed to anonymous, unknown readers…They are replete with most-valuable teachings and they manifest, apart from his great fatherly love and humility, that most refined discernment by means of which directed those souls who had only recently tasted of the monastic life. One is also impressed by his deep knowledge of monasticism, his appreciation of the spiritual and ascetical mindset, his emphasis of humility, of prayer, and above all of the will of God, the fundamental principle which he himself had followed from his youth.”
C) Epistles dating to the period of his retirement to Holy Trinity Monastery (1908-1912).
We have relatively few epistles dating this final twelve-year period of the Saint’s life, for, having withdrawn to the desert – as it was at that time – of Aegina, he primarily occupied himself with the building of the monastery and the spiritual direction of the sisters. Most of the letters dating to this period are addressed to his disciple and spiritual son, Constantinos Sakopoulos, who had proved himself a faithful aid, serving the Saint during his time as principal of the Rizareio School. Before retiring to the monastery, the Saint wondered how he would manage to put “Costas” up without turning a blind eye to the monastic canons. In the end, however, Costas did not accompany the Saint to Aegina, remaining instead in Athens ever serving the Saint and the monastery. The ten letters between them which have been preserved are connected either with matters involving necessities, or to the publication and distribution of his books.
Two letters have also been preserved which are addressed to Heiromonk Sophronios Kehagiolou, the well-known elder of the Monastery of the Honourable Forerunner in Skopelos where the Saint himself had initially wanted to take up the monastic life after his retirement from the Rizareio School. Elder Sophronios, by descent a Thracian from Raidesto, located near Sylivria, the place of the Saint’s birth, even took part in the vigils at Prophet Elisha’s Church for a period of time. These letters are dated July 1912 and July 1916 respectively. In the first, he invites Elder Sophronios to visit his monastery, and in the second he informs the Elder that he has fallen ill and that he will have to postpone his planned visit.
Saint Nektarios also maintained correspondence with heterodox Christians – Roman Catholics, Old Catholics and Anglicans – in hopes of bringing them to the Orthodox Church, whose doctrine he presented objectively and with precision. On several occasions, Saint Nektarios, by means of letter, referred Old Catholics and Anglicans interested in the ideas of union with the Orthodox Church to the Patriarchate, and several of Patriarch Joachim III’s letters responding to the Saint’s request have been preserved. Also a letter between Saint Nektarios and the Kryproferes Monastery has also been preserved, in which the Saint presents the difficulties surrounding the question of Christian unity – a topic they had broached in a previous letter. He refers them to his work on the causes of the Schism between the Eastern and Western churches, but avoids taking a position on the matter out of politeness, instead referring those interested to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. “This matter is of the utmost importance for the Eastern Church, and thus, if the Church does not take up the matter and make some ruling concerning it at the present time, then, I believe in accord with my humble opinion, all individual efforts not conclude in the desired end.”
It is not possible for us to present here the vast field of virtues, the holy avarice of this meek, innocent, humble and discerning Saint, this saint of our century, nor all the creases and folds of his holy life as these appear in his letters. If we are found worthy by God, through the prayers of the holy hierarch, we will complete the collection and publication of his Collected Works and we will thus be able dedicate more time to the analysis and appraisal of this lover of virtue and holiness.
On the occasion of Saint Nektarios Feast Day we publish the study of the honorary proffesor Fr. Theodoros Zisis.
Translated by fr. John Palmer
 This paper was delivered at a conference dedicated to Saint Nektarios hosted by the Holy Metropolis of Thessaloniki. Paper translated by Fr John Palmer.
 Particular studies dedicated to the pan-Orthodox veneration of Saint Nektarios (along with papers on other themes) appear in the proceedings from two academic conferences marking the 150th anniversary of the Saint’s birth circulated in 1996 by the Holy Metropolits of Hydra and the Monastery of the Holy Trinity in Aegina respectively. See Nun Anastasia’ article “The Veneration of Saint Nektarios in Agapia Monastery and in Romania more generally” in Woman’s Monasticism and Saint Nektarios: Conference Proceedings from the Pan-Orthodox Monastic Conference marking the 150th Anniversary (1846-1996) of the Birth of Saint Nektarios (Aegina, 9-11 September, 1996). (Athens, 1998), 349-353 as well as Nun Makaria, “The Veneration of Saint Nektarios in Serbia”, in ibid., 355-359. Also see Also see Amphilochios, Metropolitan of Mavrovounios and Parathalasa, “The Spiritual Presence of Saint Nektarios in Orthodox Serbia” in Saint Nektarios: Spiritual, Monastic, and Ecclesiastical Leader. Proceedings of the Pan-Orthodox Theological Conference marking the 150th Anniversary (1846-1996) of Saint Nektarios’ birth (Aegina, 21-23 October 1996). (Athens 2000), 145-149 and Archimandrite Bartholomaios, “The Veneration of Saint Nektarios in the Holy Monastery of Sichastria and Romania more generally”, ibid., 185-187, and finally Archpriest Valentine Asmous, “The Veneration of Saint Nektarios in Moscow and All-Russia”, ibid., 215-220.
 Psalm 68:35
 For more on Saint Nektarios’ contribution to the rebirth of monasticism and to the developing of a correct attitude towards ecclesiastical life see Protobresbyter Theodoros Zisis’ ‘The Person and Works of Saint Nektarios,’ in Saint Nektarios as a Teacher (Thessaloniki, 2000), 39-64 as well as Barnanas Giannakopolous, ‘Saint Nektarios and the Crisis of Monasticism in the Second-half of the 19th Century and the beginning of the 20th’ in Woman’s Monasticism and Saint Nektarios: Conference Proceedings from the Pan-Orthodox Monastic Conference marking the 150th Anniversary (1846-1996) of the Birth of Saint Nektarios (Aegina, 9-11 September, 1996). (Athens, 1998), 113-128 and finally, Protopresbyter George Metallinos, ‘Monasticism in Saint Nektarios’ Era’ in Saint Nektarios: Spiritual, Monastic, and Ecclesiastical Leader. Proceedings of the Pan-Orthodox Theological Conference marking the 150th Anniversary (1846-1996) of Saint Nektarios’ birth (Aegina, 21-23 October 1996). (Athens 2000), 201-214.
 See ‘Introduction’ in Saint Nektarios’ work, The Ecumenical Councils (Thessaloniki, 1972), 8.
 See Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. Saint Nektarios Kephalas, Metropolitan of Pentapolis, 1846-1920 (Athens, 1985), 243. For a list of the Saint’s writings, both published and unpublished, see the same work, 98-101.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. Saint Nektarios Kephalas, Metropolitan of Pentapolis, 1846-1920 (Athens, 1985)
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. Saint Nektarios of Pentapolis’ Catechetical Epistles Addressed to the Nuns of Holy Trinity Monastery, Aegina. (Athens. 1984).
 Nektarios of Pentapolis. 35 Pastoral Epistles. ed. Theokletos Dionysiates (Athens, 1993).
 Zisis, Theodoros. ‘The Correspondence between Saint Nektarios and the Athonite Elder, Daniel of Kotounakia’ in Saint Nektarios as a Teacher. (Thessaloniki, 2000), 15-37.
 See Strongili, Kleopas. ‘Unpublished Correspondence of Saint Nektarios of Pentapolis, Director of the Rizareio Ecclesiastical School’ in Tradition (1995), for example.
 Hadjigeorgiou, Michael. Saint Nektarios’ Visit to Syros and to Paraskevi and other Texts. (Syros, 1996), 130-132.
 See Sophokles Dimitrakopolous. Saint Nektarios of Pentapolis, the First Holy Figure of our Times: A Historical Biography based in Authentic Sources. (Athens, 1998), 73.
 Dimitrakopolous (1998), 86.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 46-47 and Dimitrakopolous (1998), 91.
 An ierokyrakas is a clergyman who is granted special permission to preach homilies. The office developed at a time when clerical education was generally very low and preaching licences were granted only to specific clerics in order to ensure that the faithful heard dogmatically correct, edifying sermons.
 See Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 186-187.
 Saint Nektarios and Daniel of Katounakia, two Great Figures of our Century: A Presentation of their Correspondence. (The Holy Mountain, 1997), 115-117.
 Dimitrakopolous (1998), 102-108.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 48-49 and Dimitrakopolous (1998), 108-109.
 The principle of Western jurisprudence which states that one is innocent until proven guilty. (ed.)
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1984), 81, 83-84, 86.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1984), 81, 83, 84, 86.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1984), 54-55 and Dimitrakopolous (1998), 112-123.
 See Monk Moses of the Holy Mountain, “Saint Nektarios and the Holy Mountain” in Saint Nektarios: Spiritual, Monastic, and Ecclesiastical Leader. Proceedings of the Pan-Orthodox Theological Conference marking the 150th Anniversary (1846-1996) of Saint Nektarios’ birth (Aegina, 21-23 October 1996). (Athens 2000), 224-225.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1984), 187-188 and Dimitrakopolous (1998), 230.
 See Strongili (1995).
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1984), 81, 83-84, 86.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 176-177.
 Theoklitos Dionysiates ‘Introductory Comments’ in 35 Pastoral Epistles, Athens (1993), 6-7.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 250.
 A small chapel, well-known for being the church where Alexandros Papdiamantis attended services, and where he often chanted. (ed.)
 Dimitrakopolous (1998), 143-145.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 74-79.
 Metropolitan Titus (Mathaiaki) of Paramythia. (1985), 84.
Our visitors also read the following: